The End of the Mueller Investigation, Deep State & Russian "Insurance Policies," Tale of 2 Countries, Democrat Conversions & Candidates
4/26/19
Democrat Candidates vs Trump
Joe Biden announced as
candidate this week (#22?), and said that 8 years of Trump would fundamentally
alter America – for the worst. No, that’s
more like what Obama promised & did – to “fundamentally transform” America (yes, doubled our debt, worsened race relations, national
security, etc.). Here they go
with projection, once again. Krugman
predicted an economic collapse under Trump, Obama asked how Trump was going to
achieve his economic promises – “wave a magic wand?” And Pelosi and AOC have practically predicted
the end of the world. Why should we ever
put any stock whatsoever in their consistently poor, hysterical and politically
self-serving predictions, including Trump’s “Russian collusion?” Now they’re going to keep digging and see if
they can come up with more substantial obstruction or business charges. Reminds me of the scripture prophesying of
those in the “last days,”… “
Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.” (2
Tim 3:1,7)
And people question
whether Trump isn’t too old? His work
schedule and ethic is much more than Obama’s ever was, and he exhibits a lot
more energy than Biden or Sanders. And
what about all the “old white guys” (Sanders, Biden) who are the leading
contenders in the Democrat primary so far?
I thought they aren’t to be given any credence. And if the men (Beto, “Spartacus”) promising
to select a woman running mate were really on the side of women, they’d step
aside for the women already in the race, and others that might otherwise enter. What a tangled web they weave, when they
enter the world of identity politics.
The Russian “Insurance Policy.”
I just heard Kimberly Strassel
(WSJ) posit a theory that had occurred to me earlier – that the (bogus) Russian
Dossier on Trump (that yielded the FISA warrant to wiretap his campaign, resulting
in the Mueller probe) was an intentional disinformation plant by Russia to
interfere with our political system. I’d
call it Russia’s “insurance policy” (to quote FBI agent Strzok’s text referring
to his & Lisa Page’s scheme in case Trump won, graphic below), in
case Trump won -- counter to the polling. And Strzok was head of FBI
counterintelligence – likely to think like his Russian counterparts. In fact, the Russians also had a policy in
place to weaken the highly favored (in the polls) candidate Hillary – with the
email hacks & leaks into her campaign.
The Russians would weaken our president no matter who won – they hedged
their bets.
And the Democrats, deep state & mainstream media have
played right into their hands, acting as “useful idiots” to unnecessarily weaken
Trump for his first 2 years in office by the innuendos hanging over his head
from the Mueller probe that proved no collusion. The Russians are laughing, and will continue
to due to the Democrats’ continuing non-stop resistance to Trump. They are, in effect, colluding with the
Russians as effectively as they accused the president of. Projection as usual. And see the story below about how
Obama interfered in the 2016 election more than Putin.
4/23/19
4/12/19
AG Barr: “I think spying on a political campaign is a big
deal.” That (the term “spying”) sent
Dems into a tizzy – they need trigger warnings, the poor snowflakes. Language is everything to them, and facts are
nothing. Don’t they agree it was spying
and a big deal when Nixon’s “plumbers” did it?
Certainly seemed impeachable then.
“Spygate is the perfect term, with similar connotations as Watergate. And Isn’t Assange’s hacking into Podesta’s
emails spying, which is why they want his head?
No, now that the whole Mueller investigation --
on which they & the media had pinned so many hopes -- came up empty on
collusion, they can't countenance that the tables might turn on them. Being on
defense for a change doesn't suit them well.
4/11/19
Amazing Democrat Conversion Stories!!! Hallelujah!
Democrats are now for extraditing Assange to the U.S. to
prosecute – strange, they didn’t seem concerned about him after previous US
national security leaks thru Assange, like Chelsea Manning’s (whose sentence
Obama commuted, despite it being the most voluminous and damaging in our
history), or Edward Snowden, who seemed almost a folk hero on the Left –
idolized as a great whistle-blower. Could
it be because Assange more recently leaked Podesta’s emails that were damaging
to Clinton’s campaign? I say send Assange
to Sweden for the sex crimes he’s up against there.
Once again their ever-shifting values center around their
political power rather than US national interests – just like their border
policies (after we have clips of Obama & others not long ago decrying
illegal immigration). And how Dems
lauded the journalistic coup of the leaked Pentagon Papers, and continue to
today in movies. And they thrived on DOJ
leaks about Trump team investigations. Hillary certainly did her share of classified
leaks with her emails. Dems seemed to live by leaks. Gee, I guess when you live by the sword, you
die by the sword after all.
This is just like their sudden conversion on Russia being
the enemy, after their love affair with Russia throughout the Cold War, the
Russia reset & as recently as Obama ridiculing Romney for trying to bring
back the Cold War. Oh, yes, now they
think Russia lost the election for Hillary (never mind that the Russia dossier
nearly did Trump in, and wreaked havoc for 2 years on all around him). Political expedience. Likewise, after over a century of secession,
segregation, KKK, etc., when they thought it could win them an election (&
many more), they are suddenly the great champions of Blacks. Only they never seem to get any results –
just keep them antagonized against Republicans.
Yet the lowest historical unemployment among Blacks (& other
minorities) is now under Trump. I loved Democrat
chairman Nadler’s dumbfounded response to Candace Owens’ testimony before the
Judiciary Committee the other day. https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4791122/candace-owens-testimony
A Tale of Two Countries
“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…” There are apparently two completely distinct
and diametrically opposed “truths” about this administration, and two separate justice
systems in the U.S.
2 views of the Trump administration:
1.
Trump’s great accomplishments with the economy
(record unemployment, tax cuts, GDP & wage growth, stock market, etc.),
national security (strengthening the military, bringing N. Korea into greater
compliance, confronting China & Russia, strengthening NATO, the border
national emergency, etc.), Supreme Court & lower court justices, etc.
2.
The broad, non-stop media & political
attacks, with no attention given to any accomplishments. Including weaponized agencies of the Obama
administration to illegally spy on Trump & hounding him, his associates and
family for 2 years.
2 justice systems:
1.
Investigating Trump’s administration &
associates based on a fraudulent FISA warrant because of the false and
politically motivated Trump dossier obtained by the Clinton campaign. And convicting several for relatively minor
process crimes (misstatements under oath, or in Flynn’s case tricking him to
make statements without due process).
And ruining their lives. The image of the French revolution mob &
guillotine on the cover of Dickens' classic seems appropos.
2.
These were lesser offenses than Hillary’s,
Smollet’s, etc. who got off with a reprimand.
Apparently if you’re a clearly Democrat-biased head of an IRS org.,
heading an FBI investigation, or Democrat Secretary of State, or a
politically-connected minority (black, gay) celebrity, and illegally go after
conservatives or mishandle classified information, or take Russian payments
while in office, or falsely accuse MAGA supporters, well, no one is prosecuted.
3/25/19
The End of the
Mueller Investigation
Steve Cortez (CNN), as guest on the Prager show, marveled
that the media & Dems are not glad Trump, our president, wasn’t found to be
in the pocket with the Russians (no collusion).
He also mentioned Mueller’s cheap parting shot that “no conclusive
evidence of obstruction of justice” was found – it’s not in a prosecutor’s role
to make that determination. Also, as I
note, how can you obstruct justice if there is no underlying crime (no
collusion with the Russians, although even that is not technically a crime).
The Trump-haters of course are never satisfied unless they
get something confirming their belief and hope for impeachment – they’ll
promote any conspiracy theory or story. So
of course they’ll now question the validity of the report, though they formerly
thought Mueller was a hero, and they’ll move on to the next conspiracy or
minutia they’ll find fault with Trump on.
As has been said, being on the Left means you never need to say you’re
sorry – as Cuomo literally told Giuliani on CNN. Truth is not a value on the Left – the ends
justifies the means, and they’ll use any sensational thing to undermine Trump,
as they have done non-stop since his election.
As Prager points out, there’s no soul-searching on the Left, because
there’s no soul to search. Leftism makes
people mean – for example children not talking to their parents because they
voted for Trump.
The Dems won’t take “no” for an answer – now Mueller (whose
integrity they’d touted) now is either in cahoots w. Trump, was inept, or Barr
is misrepresenting findings in his summary.
But Mueller quickly contradicted an earlier false report, so if Barr was
incorrect, surely he would just as quickly correct it. They demand the fully unredacted report to
see if there is more than Mueller and/or Barr acknowledge, but are ignoring the
law they themselves earlier enacted on redactions in a special prosecutor’s
report (Clinton’s), especially when grand jury or classified material is
involved.
Now after their 2-year intentional distraction, maybe we can
focus on the real Russian collusion of the Clinton campaign (the Russian
dossier) and Obama administration’s weaponizing of the DOJ/FBI/IRS against
their opponents. And their not applying
equal justice to Clinton’s other Russian and other emoluments because of their
office (read “Clinton Cash”), and getting off easy for careless handling of
classified data. The purpose of
investigating these things is not just revenge, but to assure this doesn’t
happen again to any president. Trump
criticized (but didn’t stop or obstruct) the investigation not only because he
knew (as has been proven by Mueller, whose biased team had every motivation to
find any evidence if it existed) it was barking up the wrong tree, but also
wasteful of resources and energy on both sides, when we have bigger problems to
deal with that are being neglected.
Now another of their heroes (anyone who outspokenly fights
Trump), creepy porn lawyer Avenatti, is up for massive fraud and extortion
against Nike.
Comments
Post a Comment