Foreign Affairs & the Space Program

Obama's Foreign Affairs

It must be reassuring to both our enemies and Americans that if they attack us or our allies with biological or chemical weapons of mass destruction (WMD), the Obama administration will not use nukes (our only viable WMD) against them. We wouldn't want to keep them guessing, or anything, after all.







Obama's Space Program

And just when I was hoping we could send Pelosi, Reid & Biden to the moon!



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2014 Election, Amnesty, Gruber's Lie, Race Peddlers & World Events

Image
In this Post 1.     The 2014 Election 2.     The Collapse of Obamaism & Obama’s Harmful “Gifts” 3.     The Executive Immigration Action 4.     Gruber & Obama’s Big Lie 5.     Race Peddlers & Opportunists at it Again 6.     The World Stage 7.     Campus “Rape Culture” 8.     US Economy 9.     2016 The 2014 Election It was a wave! A 2-peat after the 2010 midterms. The GOP picked up at least 8 Senate seats for a solid majority, and possibly more with the Louisiana runoff. Time to celebrate the end of Reid's 6-year Senate reign, and the end of Congressional gridlock! Also, the GOP picked up 6 governorships (more presidential options), for a solid 2/3 of states -- including some fairly blue states -- good riddance to Crist in Florida.  And the House of Representatives party map turned overwhelmingly red (see bel...
Read more

Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming

Image
I was recently reminded of the climate debate when seeing a trailer for Al Gore’s sequel to his alarmist climate movie, and shouts in the theater both against & for. We continue to hear that “97 percent of scientists agree” on the causes & consequences of climate change -- that recent and projected climate change is significantly man-made and dangerous.  Many or most uninformed people probably take these loud voices at face value, without digging deeper as to the validity of that figure, and in the face of vague statements, asking where exactly consensus lies.  And assume they must either agree with the worst case projections and proscribed policies or be branded science deniers.  “…the climate science establishment has become intolerant to disagreement and debate, and is attempting to marginalize and de-legitimize dissent as corrupt or ignorant.”  This has the intended result of "herding" -- among the general public, but also to some extent among...
Read more