“Je Suis Charlie!” & the Cultures of Offense
Following close on the heels of the N. Korean terrorist
attack on our freedom of expression, now we have a terrorist attack in Paris on
the press. A group assassination of 11
in an editorial board meeting of “Charlie Hebdo,” a satirical weekly magazine
that pokes fun at everything, including Islam, with cartoons also depicting
Mohammed. The 3 masked perpetrators, who
also killed a Muslim policeman, shouted the usual “Alahu Akbar!” and reportedly
told a bystander to tell the press they were from Al Qaida of Yemen (some think
they are desperate to regain the limelight from ISIS), and were avenging the
honor of the prophet Mohammed. 1
terrorist turned himself in, and 2 others were on the run for 2 days, then took
a hostage and went out in a blaze of gunfire.
An associate took several hostages in a Paris Jewish grocery store, to
gain release of his fellows, and killed 4 before being killed. Some are calling it the French 9/11. They are in shock that something like this
could happen in Paris! In Iraq or Syria
or Afghanistan, yes, but Paris?!
Now we’ll see how
much the press, the people, and our leaders, really want freedom of the press
rather than appeasement and political correctness. It should be obvious to even the block-headed
left-leaning media that you don’t defend it by giving every indication that you’ll
accommodate the terrorist demands. For
instance, the NY Times pixelating the cover of the magazine being held by one
of the victim editors.
Just as should have been done with the Danish cartoons many
years ago, you do it by showing solidarity with everyone publishing them as a
show of strength and defiance, which doesn’t leave only one or two who do dare,
to be such obvious targets. Charlie
Hebdo and Mark Steyn’s outfit were about the only ones who courageously did,
and have paid the price.
When we don’t stand
together, and send mixed signals to the enemies of our freedoms, this is
how we lose our freedoms, one step at a time.
Now is the time to intensify attacks on ISIS, Al Qaeda, etc. – the only
thing they understand is strength. They are
emboldened by their own successes and our weak responses. When will we learn this? Buying peace for the moment – “in our time,”
as Chamberlain said – with appeasement, pays with greater misery and less
freedom later.
Obama at the UN
recently, on another apology tour (& deceptively shifting the blame for
Benghazi), said that “the future does not belong to those who attack the
prophet of Islam.” That kind of
statement emboldens and further justifies terrorists who feel offense. Just as sympathetic statements for the
police-vilifiers, following Ferguson, emboldened and justified the
cop-killers. They, too, felt racially
offended.
This culture of
victimization and offense seems prevalent in the West, and Islam. It manifests itself in political correctness
in the West, and in sharia justice in the radical Islam world. The preoccupation is with avoiding offense, and
when it is not avoided, by justifying all sorts of persecution, legal
injunction and even murder. The racial
and cultural haters & victocrats fan the flames of resentment and
retribution, deepening the divides in our societies, and leading to more and
more lawlessness and violence. Isaiah clearly
foresaw our day – “And in that day….all that watch for iniquity…That make a man an offender for
a word,…” (Is. 29:18-21). Atheists are
offended at public displays or mention of Christmas or prayers, etc. Otherwise good and accomplished men are fired
or disenfranchised for a slip of the tongue in private. For all their avowed horror at the
Inquisition, witch trials & McCarthyism, are they really any better?
All this to achieve power
and demands by intimidation and vigilantism. When they can’t seem to earn respect, they
demand it, and force it. They demand
special treatment – for Black lawbreakers to be given special treatment, and
for the Muslim religion to be above all other religions and institutions by
being free from any criticism or restraints.
And ultimately, of course, for sharia to be implemented. They have largely achieved those objectives
in France, where, I think following the massive riots & car burnings years
ago, entire sections of cities have been declared off-limits for French police,
and sharia is in effect. But did that
satisfy them? No. They will always want more. Should the Paris attack, then, be a surprise? The French had gradually been ceding ground
to the extremists, and this is just another step in the progression. The safe areas gave the terrorists free reign
to recruit and plan attacks. They felt
emboldened and justified, by every indication of the French establishment. The French leaders criticized Charlie Hebdo,
and even filed an unsuccessful lawsuit against them. And president Obama joined in the criticism. All the leaders of Europe & the U.S. have
been feckless in this.
The only current
leader who has spoken clearly on what needs to be done, is the Egyptian
president, who this week unbelievably courageously spoke to a gathering of
their leaders, including the grand Mufti – the most authoritative Islamic
cleric in the world – like the Pope. He
said basically that the Islamic religious leaders must stop this hijacking of
their religion that is bringing the 1.2 billion Muslims in the world into
conflict with the 7 billion others. His
days are likely numbered, just as Sadat’s were after making peace with Israel.
It is incredible to me that every time the problem of radical Islam is raised in the media, the Left continues to counter with the fact that it's not all Muslims. As if we didn't long ago realize and acknowledge that (and as if that totally absolves Islam). That's why we say radical Islam. Is it only the Left that is still struggling with that distinction? And they complain that we are the ones who only think in black and white. But it is not a miniscule and ignorable number of Muslims -- as evidenced by the strength of ISIS, Boko Haram, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, the Taliban in Afghanistan & Pakistan, Iranian-sponsored terror, Hamas, Hezbollah, etc., etc. It has been said that not all Muslims are terrorists, but almost invariably (over the last 3 decades and more) all terrorists have been Muslim.
It is incredible to me that every time the problem of radical Islam is raised in the media, the Left continues to counter with the fact that it's not all Muslims. As if we didn't long ago realize and acknowledge that (and as if that totally absolves Islam). That's why we say radical Islam. Is it only the Left that is still struggling with that distinction? And they complain that we are the ones who only think in black and white. But it is not a miniscule and ignorable number of Muslims -- as evidenced by the strength of ISIS, Boko Haram, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, the Taliban in Afghanistan & Pakistan, Iranian-sponsored terror, Hamas, Hezbollah, etc., etc. It has been said that not all Muslims are terrorists, but almost invariably (over the last 3 decades and more) all terrorists have been Muslim.
The job of our
leaders is not to protect us from offense, offer criticisms of those who exercise free speech, or to
empathize with those who vilify our public protectors, but rather their job
is to protect our lives and freedoms. They
can do that by sending clearer messages beforehand that attacks on them are
not only wrong, but will not be tolerated.
Liberal Bob Beckel even said “if we don’t stand up now, we’ll rue the
day.” Even Bill Mahr has noted that it’s
not Catholics who are beheading, raping, enslaving or massacring those of other
religions, homosexuals, women, or imposing their values and conquering
territory and terrorizing. It’s
Muslims. Yes, a more radical part of
Islam, but hardly a miniscule part, and not a part that doesn’t find reasonable
justification for its actions in Koranic scripture.
When will the rest of
the PC Left wake up, shake off their fears or fairy tales, and call a spade
a spade? And begin to stop the loss of
all we (and they) value? It is absolute naiveté
to believe we can peacefully coexist with (or even negotiate with or manage) the
evils of radical Islam, the modern incarnation of Nazism. They must be squarely confronted and defeated
as a scourge.
Hillary Clinton continues the progressive line of “we need to
understand and empathize with our enemies.”
How long have we now been dealing with Islamic terror? Several decades. How long, professor Clinton, do we need to
study them before we adequately understand them to be able to actually do
something about them? Or is this a
lifelong research project for your academic amusement? Or is it merely an excuse for inaction due to fear,
because one can never fully understand or empathize with another? Or are you just a naïve eternal optimist who
is convinced they will somehow magically change if we just treat them nicely? No, they have declared war/jihad on us, and we
need to fight them if we value our lives, liberties and values over theirs. They laughed when our president went to Egypt
and naively and hubristically thought he could placate the Islamic world with
his charismatic apology tour. And the
Taliban & ISIS just waited us out after Obama announced clear total
withdrawal dates from Iraq & Afghanistan.
None of Obama’s “strategies” have
worked. And Clinton is just more of the
same.
I’m reminded of the biblical verse, “THIS know also, that in the last days perilous times shall
come……Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.” (2
Tim. 3:1,7). When in the history of the
world has anyone tamed such barbaric ideologues as these? How long must we wring our hands & be
slaughtered? I hope I never empathize
with psychopathic murderers. I think we
understand them well enough by now – all we need to know. They can’t be persuaded, negotiated with, or
ignored – they are out to kill us and take our liberties to establish a
worldwide caliphate (they have attacked nations all over the world). The only way to stop them is to kill
them. Even God, after trying persuasion
and plagues, destroyed the Egyptian armies facing Moses & the children of
Israel.
Yesterday Secretary
Kerry did seem to stand up for freedom of speech, but a bit too little, too
late. Just as they are too little and
too late with their other actions in defense of freedoms in Libya, Iraq, Syria,
Egypt, etc. Just as with the belated
standing up for the police after the shooting of two of them.
Sure, now everyone is
Charlie – “je suis Charlie.” Easy to
say that. But where were they when
Charlie was about the only place courageous enough to publish the Danish
cartoons which had generated fatwas against their publishers? The media is still gutless – they’re not
sticking their necks out one inch. The editors at Charlie knew well the risks
they were taking – they’d been firebombed, had death threats (on Al Qaeda’s
most wanted list), etc. The chief editor
said that he’d rather die at least standing than groveling. One French expert noted that the populace is
strongly behind Charlie – it is the elite leadership that is gutless and
frozen.
We must choose our
battles. And unfortunately our
current administration, and their lackeys in the media and academia and special
interest activists and others on the secular Left (including Europe), have
chosen to make mountains out of molehills, wherever they have found infrequent
or exaggerated offenses against minority or offended groups or the environment,
or social inequality. Those are the big
headlines, and political, legislative and legal battles. They ignore or minimize genocides in Africa
(2,000 killed by Boko Haram in Nigeria this week alone), in the Middle East, and
the increasing power and dominion of truly evil regimes and ideologies that are
much more of a threat to the things they claim to defend at home. Why?
Because they are cowards. They
feel safe in attacking Christians or conservatives, but not radical Muslims. They cannot acknowledge evil because of their
belief in moral relativism – they also cannot acknowledge good or assert any
values or judgment. Except,
hypocritically, their standards of political correctness.
But continuing down
this path will lead exactly where the pacifism before WW I & II led –
we will be fully engulfed in it, and it will then be a much bigger and more
intractable problem than if we’d dealt with it earlier. In fact many are saying that WW III has
already begun. Certainly the cultural
battles are already being lost. The
physical battles, as well. Because we
won’t fight. We don’t appreciate what we
have – until we’ve lost it. And then it
may well be too late.
Postscript 1/12/15
On Sunday, 4 days after the massacre, over a million people turned
out to fill the streets of Paris, in solidarity for the slain & freedom of
expression, and against the terrorists.
More than after the liberation of Paris after WW II, or VE day. Nice symbolism, but what else will they do
that will actually be effective against radicals?
And the heads of state of many nations joined
hands at the head of a procession.
Including Netanyahu of Israel, and various Arab states. But nowhere to be found was anyone from the
Obama administration. Where was our
president? Watching football on TV --
leading from behind, again. The administration
spokesman now admits it was a mistake.
Such an admission is rare or unheard of for this administration, so
perhaps deserves some commendation. But
the problem is, its judgment is all too typically good only in hindsight –
after it’s too late. They sent 3
administration officials to the funeral of Michael Brown, who was killed when attacking a police officer. AG Holder
actually was in Paris at the time, but didn’t go to the rally. Once again, inept at maintaining relations with allies.
And now yet another cyber terrorism attack – this time by ISIS,
and directed against our CENTCOM military’s social media sites. We’re also losing the cyber war,
apparently. With whatever cyber warfare
capability we have, we should be shutting down any and all terrorist websites
(recruiting & otherwise), just as North Korea’s internet went down after
their attack.
Comments
Post a Comment