Done Deal? Religious Liberty, Hillary & Trump
In this post:
- The Iran Nuclear Agreement
- Broader Ramifications
- Same-sex Marriage Decision & Religious Liberty
- The 2016 Campaigns
The Iran Nuclear Agreement
Obama and his lackeys have proven once again what miserable
negotiators they are. They have given
away the farm and gotten hardly anything in return. They may or may not have stalled the Iranian
march to nuclear weapons for a few years – inspection rules require 24 day
notice for specific sites (plenty of time for shell games like Saddam played in
Iraq), and are subject to a committee which Iran sits on. And we don’t even know all the places they
may be hiding stuff.
Apparently the deal not only lifts the embargo sanctions,
including conventional weapons, but gives Iran tens of billions of dollars to
bolster their economy, and much greater ability to foster terrorism throughout
the world, and regional instability, much more than their current level as the
prime state sponsor of terror in the world, and benefactors of Hamas,
Hezbollah, etc. There were no demands
for them to renounce their global jihad, or pursuit of intercontinental missiles
with our name on them, as they continued throughout the negotiations to shout “death
to America, and Israel.” The Iranian
singled out in the sanctions as responsible for the deaths of many hundreds of
Americans through the IED’s Iran produced and provided their proxies in Iraq,
was given relief, while the several Americans languishing in Iranian prisons
and torture chambers were forgotten.
They can build up their defenses for the day not many years
away when they will legitimately be able to break out with nuclear capability,
if not secretively before. And have ICBM’s
to deliver them to us. So, once again,
Obama has kicked the can down the road a ways.
He claims that a future American president will be much better able to
deal with the Iranians should they break out (or try) to nuclear capability. He’s partly right, of course, in that almost
anyone can deal with situations better than Obama. But the situation will be much worse, with a
much stronger Iran, including more sophisticated Russian & Chinese anti-air
and anti-ship weapons, and with the military cutbacks Obama has implemented,
and the devastation of the U.S. economy through doubling the national debt, growing
the burden of entitlements, etc. And there
will be no easy “snap back” to former sanctions.
No, much like Chamberlain, Obama wants to prematurely claim “peace
in our time.” But all hell will break
loose in not many years, with little other option than a more costly war –
perhaps Armageddon. But what does Obama
care? He has another notch in his “legacy,”
and his daughters will not have to fight the war. Why don’t we for a change start thinking
beyond our own selfish legacies, political posturing and comforts of today, to
what our children and descendants will have to deal with in terms of security,
economically, etc.? For all the compassion
liberals & the Left want to boast, why don’t they show a little towards our
posterity?
Obama is hell-bent on normalizing relations with every bad
regime on earth – Cuba, Iran, Russia, etc.
Damn the consequences. He fancies
himself another Nixon in China. His
self-confidence, as Dennis Prager calls it, is “preternatural.” And it is falsely placed. The Iranians are laughing and cheering, and
saying their policies have not changed.
The Israelis and even other Arab countries in the region and other
allies of ours are saying it’s a horrible deal.
In Israel there is unheard of total agreement by all parties that it’s a
terrible deal, and even their Palestinian citizens (well, part of that is the
Sunni-Shiite, Arab-Persian split). But
Obama is confident he’s right, and everyone else, including the opposition in
the U.S., is wrong. And there are a fair
number of Democrats who are also speaking out against it – possibly enough to
override a veto, which Obama has promised.
And just to be sure, and to not leave it in the hands of the democratic
process in America, he’s now taking it to the U.N., to try to entrench it
there, so that should Congress appear to be ready to override, he can say, “well,
we can’t go against the U.N. international agreement/consensus,” which of
course Russia & China will back.
Broader Ramifications
Neither the Iranians, the Cubans nor the Russians have any
greater incentive to change their ways as a result of the idiotic “reset”
overtures of Secretary Clinton, Kerry, & Obama. In fact, they are emboldened by our
impotence, and apparent desperation evidenced in our miserably negotiated
deals. It sounds all very noble and
idealistic to express faith and hope in the ultimate goodness of our enemies. But the realities are that it is very naïve
in the light of not only their records, but of all the lessons of history. Which we are doomed to repeat if we don’t
learn from them. After all their years
of criticizing our past policies, now they’ve had a chance to try theirs, and
they’ve failed. Obama says we can’t stop
evil/terror with force alone, but with better ideas. And was it better ideas that defeated the
Nazis, Imperial Japan, the Confederacy, the North Koreans/Chinese, the Soviets
in Afghanistan, etc.? Often, with
certain enemies, war is not only the answer, but the only answer – unless we
want to surrender and let them have their way.
And Obama’s premature withdrawal in Iraq has precipitated,
as predicted by Bush, the rise of a much more barbaric power in the region –
ISIS. Which now is inspiring jihadi death
& terror in the U.S. and abroad. But
Obama & the Left will never accept any blame for that – they’ll always find
another scapegoat. After all, being on
the Left means never having to say you’re sorry, or wrong.
Experts on radical Islam tell us that many Muslims believe
that whenever a Caliphate is established, declared & holds territory,
devout Muslims are obligated to flock to it and/or fight for it. That is what we’re seeing with deadly
consequences as in the recent Chattanooga killing of several Marines by yet
another radicalized American who was indoctrinated apparently by social
media. If we can’t deal with the social
media & telephone recruitment & planning, which is becoming
increasingly difficult with the lapse of the Patriot Act, and with increasing
use of encryption technology, then the alternative we have to reverse the trend
and stop such attacks as long as the Caliphate exists, is to go over and
eliminate the Caliphate. In the meantime, we need to reinstate the military's 2nd amendment rights to carry firearms for self-defense while on military duty on bases.
Same-Sex Marriage Decision &
Religious Liberty
Ted Olsen (argued at the Supreme Court for same-sex
marriage) was asked the question of why not polygamy, if it’s just a matter of
anyone who loves anyone else? He said
that the states can decide what’s in the interest of the state in limiting
marriage (e.g., if children are affected), and that for same-sex marriage, the
states opposing it only came up with “tradition.” Well, isn’t the number 2 a tradition that
shouldn’t by that reasoning be limiting?
And even for thousands of years (Abraham, Islam, etc.) a fairly
established tradition. Which traditions
are to be rejected? Seems like a
slippery slope – incest, etc.
Donna Brazil (Democrat strategist): “Glad we’ve moved past this issue, and now we
have to fight other battles.” Yes, for
them, it’s just one battle after another – never content. And so for conservatives, it similarly must
be one battle after another. We’re still
after a few decades fighting the abortion battle -- with the recent video of a
Planned Parenthood abortion clinic doctor flippantly discussing harvesting of
fetal organs.
Mike Huckabee called for civil disobedience – obey the higher law of
God. The California Family Council
outlined it’s plans to continue the battle:
http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=87cde430b458e9e44356c3289&id=3c56247747&e=d46241a061
. The Family Research Council gives strategies for fighting for religious
liberty: http://www.frc.org/religion-in-public-life
. And Focus on the Family has some
suggestions: http://www.focusonthefamily.com/socialissues/promos/supreme-court-marriage-decision
The LDS Church’s leaders issued these statements:
OFFICIAL STATEMENT — 26 JUNE 2015
Supreme Court Decision Will Not Alter Doctrine on Marriage
SALT LAKE CITY —
The Church issued the following statement Friday:
"The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints acknowledges that following today's ruling by the Supreme Court,
same-sex marriages are now legal in the United States. The Court's decision
does not alter the Lord's doctrine that marriage is a union between a man and a
woman ordained by God. While showing respect for those who think differently,
the Church will continue to teach and promote marriage between a man and a
woman as a central part of our doctrine and practice."
The Church has outlined its doctrine and position on marriage in
the document The Divine Institution of Marriage.
The leaders of the LDS Church issued a statement read July 5 over the
pulpits at its congregations. Here is
the link to that statement: Church leaders' counsel to members after the
Supreme Court same-sex marriage decision.
On its website, the LDS Church expounded on the importance
of religious freedom: http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/official-statement/religious-freedom
SALT LAKE CITY —
The Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints issued the following statement Monday [July 13] regarding
the Boy Scouts of America resolution for adult leader
standards:
“As a chartering
organization, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has always had
the right to select Scout leaders who adhere to moral and religious principles
that are consistent with our doctrines and beliefs. Any resolution
adopted by the Boy Scouts of America regarding leadership in Scouting must
continue to affirm that right.”
The 2016 Campaigns
Hillary attacked Jeb Bush for saying that part of the
solution to low incomes is the need to work more hours. What he was referring to was the reduction in
hours per week for many jobs from 40 to 30, due to Obamacare. It has been said that if you like Greece, you’ll
love Hillary. Yes, she’ll lead us to the
same economic crisis, with more socialism, greater union pensions, less
productivity, shorter hours, earlier retirement – all leading to
bankruptcy. As if the mounting national
debt and currently unfunded liabilities aren’t bad enough. And Hillary attacked Scott Walker for his
union-busting. But his state has now
risen by several significant metrics, including average income, employment,
budget surplus, education, etc. The
unions & pensions & 50% of their jobs being in the government sector have
killed Greece’s economy.
Trump’s remarks about Mexico sending us many of their worst
criminals & unskilled people, in addition to some good people, are getting
a lot of press. To the joy of Democrats
& consternation of Republicans. But
his steady popularity in the polls seems to bear out the kernel of truth in his
statement, and the clamor for someone willing to take on political correctness
and fight the establishment and malaise.
Reinforced by the recent shooting of Kate Steinle in San Francisco by a
multiple-prison-term illegal protected by the sanctuary city. Ann Coulter’s book, “Adios America!” also
points out how previous immigration tended to bring in the best from other
countries, and the current system (inaction about illegals) brings in the
lowest of society, perpetuating & enhancing the income inequality that is
the keystone of the Democrat (Hillary’s) platform.
Yes, just another example of the self-perpetuating job
insurance that Democrat policies ensure, including their miserable tactics in
the “war on poverty” – the welfare system, etc.
They merely perpetuate poverty through single-parent households
dependent on welfare, undisciplined, listless young men who are prone to crime,
etc. And other failed social engineering
like Dodd-Frank that put people in mortgages they couldn’t afford, and resulted
in the housing bubble burst and financial collapse we’re still recovering
from. As long as these are perpetuated,
they have an issue they can forever claim to stand up for, for the little guy, and
yet never deliver. Wake up, America! Try something different!
I am of course somewhat biased myself, being an Eagle Scout
(and I am attending an Eagle court of honor today), but I did note that among
the current candidates, there are two Eagle Scouts: Scott Walker & Rick Perry. And formerly, Jon Huntsman, Gerald Ford, &
H. Ross Perot. And many astronauts.
I continue to be impressed more and more with Scott Walker
& Carly Fiorino. Carly can (&
has) take on Hillary like no one else. In
fact, I’m thinking that might be a great ticket with both of them – a real
dynamic duo, with solid records of accomplishment. And I still like Marco Rubio. Bush’s & Trump’s leads in the polls I
think are at this point more name recognition, and will fade, although perhaps
somewhat slowly with both of their huge war chests. As the others become better known in the
debates in a few weeks, we will no doubt begin to see the polls shift, as we
went through various candidates of the month in the last election.
Comments
Post a Comment